World Fitness Blog : Leading Global Bloggers

December 14, 2022

Weightlifter Loredana Elena Toma (71KG) Captures 119-Kilogram World Record Snatch En Route to World Championship

In a different weight class, Toma captured her second career World championship.

As a weightlifter, Loredana Elena Toma isn’t known to mess around. In 2017, the Romanian competitor officially burst on the international scene when she captured the Senior 63-kilogram World title at the 2017 International Weightlifting Federation (IWF) World Weightlifting Championships. Years later, with more training, seasoning, and strength under her belt, Toma is still chugging along as a powerhouse.

On Dec. 12, 2022, Toma successfully notched a 119-kilogram (262.3-pound) snatch. The feat in Bogotá, Colombia, set a Senior World Record for the 71-kilogram division, helped Toma win the 71-kilogram World championship, and is five kilograms more than Toma’s previous all-time personal record of 114 kilograms (251.3 pounds). She captured that mark at the 2021 European Weightlifting Championships (EWC).

More from Breaking Muscle:

With the 71-kilogram weight class relatively new to the international stage, Toma’s World Record snatch also set a precedent for the previously untouched World Standard. The said snatch World Standard mark of 117 kilograms (257.9 pounds) stood for four years without being claimed before Toma eclipsed it at the 2022 IWF Worlds. The IWF established the World Standard on lifts for competitive weight classes when the organizing body reorganized its divisions in 2018.

On her clean & jerk, Toma was able to lock out 137 kilograms (302 pounds) to give herself her 256-kilogram (564.4-pound) World title-winning total. Here’s a quick rundown of Toma’s individual performance at the 2022 IWF World Weightlifting Championships:

Loredana Elena Toma | 2022 IWF World Weightlifting Championships Top Stats

  • Clean & Jerk — 137 kilograms (302 pounds)
  • Snatch — 119 kilograms (262.3 pounds)
  • Total — 256 kilograms (564.4 pounds)

While Toma’s World Record snatch mark and World title are undoubtedly the primary highlights of the 71-kilogram weight class’ output at the 2022 IWF Worlds, it wasn’t the only notable figure or performance. For example, fifth-place finisher/American weightlifter Olivia Reeves took home a clean & jerk bronze medal of 139 kilograms (306.4 pounds).

For further context on a macro scale, 104 kilograms (229.3 pounds) was enough for a gold medal on the snatch at the 2021 WWC. At the 2022 edition of the WWC, nine of the participating 71-kilogram Women’s athletes snatched more than 104 kilograms. Meanwhile, 135 kilograms was enough for the clean & jerk gold meal at the 2021 WWC. In 2022, six of the featured competitors clean & jerked more than 135 kilograms.

Here’s an overview of the Women’s 71-kilogram podium at the 2022 IWF World Weightlifting Championships:

IWF World Weightlifting Championships | Women’s 71-Kilogram Podium

  • First place — Loredana Elena Toma (Romania): 256-kilogram total | 119-kilogram (262.3-pound) Senior World Record snatch | 137-kilogram (302-pound) clean & jerk
  • Second place — Zeng Tiantian (China): 253-kilogram total | 113-kilogram (241.1-pound) snatch | 140-kilogram (308.6-pound) clean & jerk
  • Third place — Angie Palacios Dajomes (Ecuador): 252-kilogram total | 116-kilogram (255.7-pound) snatch | 136-kilogram (299.8-pound) clean & jerk

More from Breaking Muscle:

With a new World Record and another World title to her name in a different division, Toma could theoretically stop lifting heavy barbells overhead immediately and still be remembered as a great. Instead, something says that the superstar may write another illustrious chapter of her career in 2023.

Featured image: @one_kilo_ on Instagram

Source

August 19, 2021

The Lifting Game: Weightlifters Versus CrossFit Athletes

Filed under: Fitness — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 12:12 am

Watching Seb Ostrowics over at Weightlifting House on YouTube is one of my guilty pleasures. A bowl of Frosted Flakes, ice cold milk, and the droopy, sonorous musings of a weightlifting nerd are all it takes to reduce my cholesterol and keep me away from Real Housewives of Atlanta.

Ostrowics’ Just How Much Better Are Weightlifters Than CrossFitters is a little erudite, a little respectful, and a lot of geeky lifting love.

 

 

Read The Lifting Game: Weightlifters Versus CrossFit Athletes at its original source Breaking Muscle:

http://breakingmuscle.com/news/the-lifting-game-weightlifters-versus-crossfit-athletes

Source

August 4, 2021

1, 2, 3 World Records for Lasha Talakhadze and Olympic Gold Dominance

Filed under: Fitness — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 10:00 pm

Lasha Talakhadze of Georgia is the most dominant weightlifter of his generation and he is well on his way to being the first man to break the 500 kg total in weightlifting.

At the Tokyo Olympics, in the 109+ kg category, Talakhadze broked the world record for the snatch with 223 kg and then he broke the world record for the clean and jerk with 265 kg and then, as you would expect, he broke the world record for a total of 488 kg.

 

 

Read 1, 2, 3 World Records for Lasha Talakhadze and Olympic Gold Dominance at its original source Breaking Muscle:

http://breakingmuscle.com/news/1-2-3-world-records-for-lasha-talakhadze-and-olympic-gold-dominance

Source

February 10, 2021

Strength Training and the Efficacy of Electromyography (EMG)

Electromyography (EMG) is a scientific method of testing muscle activity. It is well regarded, some say, in the non-scientific community because of the simplicity of a stronger reading means stronger muscles. However, it is neither popular or as well-studied as it could be so, the question remains as to its effectiveness.

Considering EMG is not a popular choice, the following questions may come to mind:

  • Where is the efficacy in applying it to training?
  • Should there be a narrower focus on exercises with higher peak or mean EMG performance?
  • What risks do we run by narrowing our views to said exercise groups?

The purpose of this article is to supply a brief overview of EMG, its application to exercise, and lastly, should everyone undergo EMG specific training, or will journals/articles suffice in exercise choice?

Electromyography Infographic

Neurological EMGs Versus Kinesiological EMGs

Electromyography (EMG) is an experimental technique concerned with the development, recording, and analysis of myoelectric signals. Myoelectric signals are formed by physiological variations in the state of muscle fiber membranes.

Peter Konrad1

Strength Training and the Efficacy of Electromyography (EMG) - Fitness, olympic weightlifting, neuromuscular power, athletes, snatch, clean and jerk, functional movement, plyometrics, electrical muscle stimulation, Kinesiology, bodybuilder, emg, glute strength, Electromyography

This can be further classified into neurological and kinesiological EMG.

This article will discuss kinesiological EMG only as its function most closely relates to training regimes, voluntary neuromuscular activation, and functional movements. Unlike neurological EMG tests, kinesiological EMGs are non-invasive.

In short, we are looking at how muscles fire during movement, and in the case of exercise, what movement innervates the intended muscle group more for the said individual.2

  • The setup time for a kinesiological EMG study is minimal as the only objects involved are electrodes, which can be hardwired to a device or sent wirelessly to an accompanying receiver.
  • Electrical current does not run through these electrodes. Instead, it measures the output of various muscles during a functional movement.
  • However, for each EMG study, the cost associated could be in from the mid-hundred-dollar range to three hundred dollars. By comparison, neurological EMGs, can run into thousands of dollars and require insertion of needles into the muscle and close monitoring.3

The other inherent risk is who conducts the study.

Time can be wasted if the professional does not set up a movement properly or does not understand the output data.

It is best to hire someone trained, such as a physical therapist, sports medicine doctor, or specialist with certification in EMG or even NEUBIE devices. Benefits extend into the competitive sector for bodybuilders and active sports’ athletes.

Lastly, an unintended risk of EMG testing for exercise choice is narrowing one’s variation in exercises.

Take Olympic lifting, for example; the movements tested during competition are the clean and jerk and the snatch.

However, during training, front squats, back squats, overhead press, deadlifts, and pullups (to name a few) are executed during a program.

It will be to the practitioner’s detriment if an EMG result causes a psychological effect.

The foci of exercises orbits around these core exercise ad infinitum, avoiding the ones that improve mobility, plyometric work, and balance.

Integrating EMG into Your Training

The safest way to begin EMG training is to:

  1. Hire a certified professional.
  2. Set up days where there are maximal recovery options.

In recovering effectively between sessions, primary muscle groups can fire more effectively, thereby improving the study’s effectiveness.

In the said study, the professional learns to ascertain which movement pattern presents the greatest bang for one’s buck.

It accomplishes this by measuring the mean and peak activation during contraction of the intended muscle group while shifting positions.

For example, in the gluteus maximus muscle group recruitment, one can look at the sumo deadlift, which places the trainee in a static abducted stance versus the glute abduction machine, versus a resistant band fire hydrant movement.

The professional then walk through the data and identify these two values, and compares them per movement.

In discussing with the client, the professional would opt to perform one movement over another to have the maximal effect during a training session alone.

EMG sessions should not be treated as an intense workout session.

Instead, it should be akin to a laboratory test or doctor’s visit where you are liable to spend either a brief time due to the muscle areas in question or a significantly longer time due to optimizing larger muscle groups.

One might ponder if EMG training is right for them.

Follow the Science in Your Quest for Performance

It is understood that Instagram pages are littered with gurus and trainers who have all the answers and are obviously doctors of kinesiology, physical therapists, and orthopedic surgeons.

The authority I am referring to is legitimate coaches in the field with experience and degrees who contribute to science.

Within this body of science, articles generate pearls on EMG studies, illuminating why certain movements are performed in contrast to another.

Nevertheless, in practicality, no one has time to read all those studies, and unfortunately, unless you’re in that niche, no one cares. They want to be given the answers.

So, if you want the answers, pay for them.

Pay for it by a structured process, consistency in the gym, hiring a coach, and reading summarized literature from reputable resources (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).

EMG studies are beautiful, and they take away the guesswork.

Lucy will perform heavy hip thrusts, RDL’s and sumo squats to make her booty pop.

Meanwhile, Andrea modifies her hyperextensions and resistance band glute work.

Is EMG a Luxury for Athletes Only?

Does EMG serve us well across the board, or is this a luxury only to be spent on competitors or athletes?

The questions I would like you to think about are as follows:

  • How long have you been training?
  • Do you train to stay fit or develop a certain aesthetic?
  • How frequently do you train?
  • Have you hired a coach and or professional before?
  • Do you have disposable income?
  • Do you foresee yourself competing?
  • What data outside of exercise preference are you trying to collect? I.e., provides the best assistance in a sprint or passing a physical exam.
  • Are you injured or returning from injury? I.e., relearning how to activate muscle groups.
  • Do you enjoy and are you open to being observed or studied?
  • Is maximal hypertrophy your end goal?
  • Have you tried to bring up lagging body parts without success?

If you answer the previous questions accordingly, you may want to consider EMG.

References

1. Konrad, P., “The ABC of EMG. A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography,” Version 1.4, Mar 2006, 5-30.

2. Basmajian, J. V., DeLuca, C. J. “Muscles Alive: Their Function Revealed by Electromyography,” Pub, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1985. 2 – p1.

3. Dr. Arthur Kornblit, MD., “How Much Does an EMG Test Cost?” Spend On Health, accessed January 20, 2021.

Source

Powered by WordPress